Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Education is regarded as one of the many crucial skill that can uplift any nation in this modern era. In this regard, it is a general hypothesis that financial aspects of literacy requires consideration as compulsory part of the schooling profile. Indeed, I strongly agree with the above argument and will elaborate the key prospects in detail below.
To begin with, all the developed countries owe success to continuous improvement in field of education. The growing concern of economic stability has led to the creation of perception that economics needs to be made a compulsory component at the grass root level in schools. For example, the western world has certainly recognized the significance of financial education and consequently have produced a number of notable personalities in this particular profession. In addition, nowadays the developing nations have also adopted a similar strategy in order to overcome the bad experiences faced in this sector of national economy, In short, the countries strength is normally qualified by the national resources and that is where financial academic plays a key role.
Furthermore, when an employee after years of hard work reaches the prominent designation as managing director or chief financial officer mostly require exceptional pecuniary skills for making the right decisions to take their companies to avoid the probability of loss is whilst progressing on the road of development. For instance, Siemens, General Electric, the big giants take this accounting factor quite seriously in this context. Therefore, the monetary trade becomes quite important for maintaining a worthy reputation in the world.
To recapitulate, I pen down by saying that business literacy has a critic impact globally and hence should be considered as a necessary section of the school education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ctor of national economy, In short, the countries strength is normally qualified by the n...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46315789474 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02454512146 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4053006199 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.545454545 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185020157754 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617910529091 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327917040695 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102822264682 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391225670309 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.