Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the 21st century,we are able to consume the varieties of food such as burger, pizza, bread, and etc. All these dishes are originated in distinct part of the world and we are eating it on a regular basis. It is argued by a few individuals that if we eat our local food, will help to ameliorate the economy and benefit the environment. Regardless of this, some people are eating food traveling from other countries which are distant from here. In my opinion, we should not restrict consumers to only indigenous fruits and vegetables.
The countries which are near the equators doesn't have suffice soil conditions to grow most of the vegetables and fruits. Furthermore, they can harvest only a specific range of foods which can't be eaten as they are produced in gigantic amount and storing them in the cold storage demands a hefty sum of money. Therefore, it is better to transport them to another country where people can eat them. For example, the Middle East is the biggest exporter of dates because in extreme humid weather only certain fruits can be cultivated.
Despite of increase in the population, we are getting enough food to serve 7.5 billion people because of these food migrations. Moreover, recent surveys indicated the exponential growth in the consumption of fast food in the American food chains opened in India who employed a lot of scholars in this sector to feed the population, therefore, it aggrandized the GDP of this country. However, if we only eat the local made food it won't require to transport to other parts of the country and thousands of worker in the transportation sector will be unemployed which will impact our financial growth.
In conclusion, transporting the food from different countries supported to expand the range of items available to eat and help in increasing the financial growth and environmental balance. Still, there are a handful of people who are living in remote area and limited to their native food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
In the 21st century,we are able to consume the varieties of fo...
^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...s of food such as burger, pizza, bread, and etc. All these dishes are originated in dist...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e countries which are near the equators doesnt have suffice soil conditions to grow mo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sufficed'.
Suggestion: sufficed
...which are near the equators doesnt have suffice soil conditions to grow most of the veg...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...st only a specific range of foods which cant be eaten as they are produced in gigant...
^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...vironmental balance. Still, there are a handful of people who are living in remote area...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... area and limited to their native food.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92168674699 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7251896156 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557228915663 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7188011086 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241469056326 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809538399383 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543927800476 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142780294227 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197318768092 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.