Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial debate about food production whether this should be provided by farmers or food industries all around the world. I would strongly opine that this is the best approach to help indigenous farmers, so I will agree with this statement and discuss it now.
First of all, concentrating on purchasing local food productions has the significant merits for citizens. There is an obvious opinion about people whom they have a tendency to buy ready-foods from industries that they would support some brands and companies in order to export their production to other nations. However, in my opinion, I would consider that focusing on original foods and local healthier foods can aid the ploughmen. It is noticeable that they can obtain adequate money by selling them and can substitute their vehicles and equipment by high-tech and modern ones.
Moreover, there are many advantages of using up healthier and natural foods for consumers. First of all, the organic vegetables and fruits, which are grown in the fresh air and pure habitats, are much more healthiness. In fact, chemicals and pesticides are rarely utilized in these fields, and people can take advantage of healthy foods. Secondly, the cost of production are a bit lower as opposed to ready productions providing in industries. For example, people can conveniently save up their money, and also have a healthier lifestyle.
In conclusion, it can be seen that paying attention to local foods has many upsides for local farmers. First of all, they are able to support their countrymen, and secondly they can obtain profits from consuming non-chemical foods.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... the cost of production are a bit lower as opposed to ready productions providing ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17358490566 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80602515044 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7084920327 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208333782895 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077968301828 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596101106542 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128187656944 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256354937598 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.