Foreign tourist abroad should be charged more than local people to visit a country’s cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words
There is no gainsaying the given topic attracts the immediate attention owing to its uniqueness and versatility. There is always a heated debate on to what extent foreign tourists should be treated in terms of accommodation and overall costing. A group of people assert that foreign tourists should be charged more than locals to facilitate economic stability. In my opinion, I slightly disagree to this verdict as it might be discouraging for people to visit different historical locations around the floor being overpriced.
To begin with, there are a lot of tourist’s attractions around the world. These are always flooded with tourists throughout the year. Putting up a high price for foreign tourist as compared to local would leave a negative impact as this would depict a clear sense of discrimination and biasness. There is already a price variant within different countries as dollar price in Pakistan would differ as compared to India. By exchanging local currency in a foreign currency most of the tourists are already paying high price. For instance a tourist from Pakistan is paying 100 dollars for twin tower visit in Malaysia, it would cost him 12800 per ticket whereas for a US national its 100 dollars only. To elucidate it further, despite of having financial challenges people around the world are eager to explore different cultures and historical attractions, in order to learn diversified culture around the globe. By imposing high pricing, diminishing trend would be observed in tourists visiting different countries as planned their visit budget according to their capacity and limit.
On the contrary, by leveraging high prices, this would certainly boost economic stability. For any country tourist visits and exploration plays an important part in achieving economic goals. This idea of putting high prices would certainly bring incremental revenue.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, while deciding the price factors for tourist’s attractions certain elements or consequences must be kept in mind. There should be a moderate approach to this ideation. Prices should not be too high that it kills the ultimate purpose of economic boost. Government should undertake considerations and expectations from tourist’s perspective also.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions around the floor being overpriced. To begin with, there are a lot of touris...
^^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... paying 100 dollars for twin tower visit in Malaysia, it would cost him 12800 per...
^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...tations from tourist's perspective also.
^^^^
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from tourist's perspective also.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, as for, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47443181818 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98632250344 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6297595453 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.421052632 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265839617583 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849704275948 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717676192085 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165645677453 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949523177603 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.