It is sometimes argued that international holidaymakers should be charged more money than the locals as the admission fee for entry to cultural and historical places. This, from my standpoint, would be unacceptable and counterproductive to the host country.
Admittedly, the local state needs a budget for the maintenance of its tourist attractions. However, such expenses have already been covered by the locals’ annual taxes as well as the government’s subsidization. Foreign travelers, on the other hand, should spend money on a multitude of goods and services, including food, commuting, accommodation, and souvenirs, when traveling, which would make a huge contribution to the economy of the host country. To this cause, it would be objectionable to impose a higher fee on them.
Furthermore, charging visitors from other countries would exert the opposite impact on the nation itself. If such people got a bad impression that they must give additional payment compared to the local ones for access to historical or cultural places, they would mostly feel unpleasant and share their dissatisfaction with others. That would mean there would be fewer potential customers, imposing detrimental influences on the further development of the country’s tourism industry. For instance, Turkey’s government used to increase the price for international visits, which was four times higher than for local visitors, to its famous historical place - Topkapı palace. It was a such decision that reduce the number of foreign visitors to that country, making its tourism sector experience a severe crisis.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I disagree with the argument in favor of higher prices for foreigners to make a visit to cultural and historical attractions.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55147058824 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.231172053 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8611259894 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239803211865 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810646553931 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709720435519 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153016336881 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434313535061 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55147058824 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.231172053 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8611259894 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239803211865 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810646553931 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709720435519 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153016336881 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434313535061 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.