Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
In most of the countries, fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas are the primary sources of energy. But some nations are taking a step forward to promote the usage of renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and tidal energy. In my opinion, this could be seen as progress due to its positive effect on the environment and saving the limited energy resources for the future.
The main advantage of using a sustainable form of energy is that it is eco-friendly. As we know that the burning of fossil fuels emits toxic gases such as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the air and leads to global warming. Also, it pollutes the air quality and paves the way to severe respiratory health problems. If precautionary measures are not taken to take advantage of natural resources such as sunlight, wind and seas, then time is not far when the whole earth will transform into a boiling pot. Recently, the air quality index of Delhi, the capital city of India has been recorded as 425, which lies in the severe category because of the emission of toxins from private vehicles using fuels. Therefore, the idea of turning to green energy resources is a positive step taken by governments to make the environment pollution-free.
Another benefit of using these limitless sources of energy is that it is renewable as compared to conventional energy resources which are limited. As it takes millions of years to form fossil fuels and the depletion of these is at an alarming rate. Therefore, our heavy reliance on fossil fuels is the biggest threat to the upcoming generation. On the other hand, energy generated by solar panels and windmills is an everlasting source of power. Hence, it is high time that we should support the efforts of the government to protect our critical resources. Finland is a prime example of generating 60% of energy for domestic usage by installing solar panels on the roofs.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that fossil fuels are a popular source of energy across the globe but at the same time, I also believe that the initiatives taken by government authorities to endorse the sustainable energy sources are clearly positive and it should be the global priority to invest in renewable energy projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and is a prime example of generating 60% of energy for domestic usage by installi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87434554974 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66278239375 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6014078329 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341315215873 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102845038672 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803294156015 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213136563711 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859901533583 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.