Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development

Some countries totally rely on non-renewable energy that means pulling abundant minerals from the core element which is available the fourth layer from the earth's flat surface.

As we know, the list of minerals that the government consented for industries such as copper, silver, coal, oil, and gas. Especially coal is used for producing Carbon monoxide, which is named CO2. For that, the power of digging deep into the core element, the administrative organization exporting those minerals into some countries which those used for generating electricity. As a consequence, scarce minerals are present in the earth which leads to natural disasters according to the new report 2020. Instead of discovering the earth's main resources to produce electricity, the government has to look for alternate sources that hold Wind, Water, Solar.

As a matter of fact, solar is an earth's most wealth renewable energy and in addition to that, there are lots of advantages if we bring up this into the market. The solar is completely depends on the sun exposure. When Sun exposed the rays into the solar plates, an integral mechanism of silicon plates converts sun energy into power. Moreover, that will be stored in a capacitor that the government intended to export for culminate country's economy. On the other hand, Windmill is expecting the flows of air in the atmosphere and to get power from water, water turbines are used widely.

To conclude, the non-renewable sources are getting, thousands of years to form a structure beneath the surface, but industrialists could bring up those resources and make them into electrical energy. As a result, minerals are depleted in the core element of the earth. Industrialist or the government has to step forward and disseminate about renewable energy which certainly will not impact our environment.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e sources that hold Wind, Water, Solar. As a matter of fact, solar is an earths ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, as to, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21959459459 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82693974014 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6355053545 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190682826564 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063421081544 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498375948976 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102529106966 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564362315462 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.