Government and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than expecting individuals to take responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
It is commonly believed that authorities and giant organizations should work together to resolve the climate issues, however many think that it is solely the responsibility of the common man to take care of such global issues. I do not quite agree with this view. In my viewpoint, everyone has responsibility to contribute a bit to reverse environmental damages. Of course, government and wealthy organizations have a major role to play but individuals have a responsibility too in minimizing global environment hazard.
To embark with, authorities can play a pivotal role in solving environmental issues by enacting strict laws and hefty penalties to prevent deforestation and illegal mining. For instance, illegal sand mining has destroyed the majority of rivers in India. Hence, strict policies and heavy fines are needed to prevent this practice. Likewise, the cleaning of forest land for building industries and residential space should be stopped with stringent laws. In addition, the promotion of electronic vehicles is another way to solve environmental damages. Only higher authorities can take such effective measures.
Moreover, Giant industries are the biggest polluters hence they have a greater role to play to reverse at least some of damages cause by them. As big brands are getting wealthier by selling their products in the market with the support of people, therefore they must benefit the society by starting initiatives like cleaning environment dirt to make survival better for tomorrow. Manufacturing companies must ensure that the waste material do not get dumped untreated in into water bodies.
Furthermore, individuals can also play significant role in minimizing global environmental hazard. We must resist the temptation to buy products we do not need. We need to realize that our use and throw culture is causing great deal of damages to the planet. We can do this by adopting responsible consumerism. Likewise, another way to solve this issues is by not using enormous amount of plastic in daily life, which is hazardous pollutant of the soil. Instead of using this, individuals efforts could be taken into account opting got eco friendly substitutes. For example, people can use paper and cloth bags instead of plastic in supermarkets.
To conclude, global environment issues cannot be solved by any particular person or regime. Collective efforts of communities, governments and big companies are required to resolve damages caused to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 260, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng great deal of damages to the planet. We can do this by adopting responsible con...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43958868895 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04273329272 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575835475578 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2610745989 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1818181818 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167851931733 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486240511013 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043686492106 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909886155922 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344192244666 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.