Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Government investments are more important for a countries growth. It is a concerning discussion that they should focus their expenditures on public services rather then spending on entertainment facilities. I express my strong agreement that government should put their money on public welfare services and we will discuss more in the upcoming sections.
Our country has many issues that are unattended due to poor focus by the government to address those issues, when such problems are existing it is unnecessary for the government to spend money in building music and theaters, which is irrelevant for the public needs. There are historical references exist and that shows such buildings developed were unused and now a days they are kept as a museum without a proper maintenance.
Myriad services that are unavailable to the public like better education, quality of health care service and inter-city public transport. Government should focus to develop those missing service which are key for the public development. There is evidence that shows from last two decades schools and their facilities insufficient when compared to the kids population ratio and similarly, mode of public transport is also very limited. Therefore, it is most important to be considered in building those facilities across the country. Recently, we have seen that Dubai has started to build and develop their country with these three basic needs to fulfill local nationals and also for international visitors. Such growth focusing future is always an admirer to the entire world.
With no further arguments, it is very clear that the vision of the government should change and ensure that all services that benefited to public should be considered at priority. In my view, government should focus on improvement of the cities by enforcing the spend on public services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...nt investments are more important for a countries growth. It is a concerning discussion t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... expenditures on public services rather then spending on entertainment facilities. I...
^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...uch buildings developed were unused and now a days they are kept as a museum without a pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...buildings developed were unused and now a days they are kept as a museum without a pro...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...ities insufficient when compared to the kids population ratio and similarly, mode of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... improvement of the cities by enforcing the spend on public services.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, then, therefore, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3231292517 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81852956985 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7321870855 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207796432545 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778462524249 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552410000664 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135569170602 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285813780956 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.