Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is recommended by some people that the governing authority should concentrate on investing funds in public utilities rather than in the entertainment industry. I completely align my opinion with this view because it will lead to human capital development and societal advancement. This essay will x-ray my reasons for supporting government expenditure on public infrastructure.
To begin with, one of the most probable reason for the call to divert public funds into people oriented services is because it can foster human capital development. This is as a result of the fact that no nation functions effectively without human resources, such that when the people are ignored in the affairs of things, the society experiences decline. To illustrate, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals prioritized human capital development over other things due to the fact that it is the lifeblood of the nation. Hence, more money should go to public service delivery.
On another hand, while it is true that the entertainment industry has great contributions to the wealth of a country, the annual appropriation of the government should lean more on the side of providing social amenities because it would lead to transformation of the society. The people must be able to access things like good roads, pipe bourne water, and efficient healthcare system as this are used to measure growth and success. For instance, the Nigeria government has pledge to spend more on these infrastructures in order to meet up with developed nations.
In conclusion, spending government resources on the arts may be a good step to take, but it is not as beneficial as spending on people driven projects and services. In fact compared with the later, the former is a waste of valuable resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e governing authority should concentrate on investing funds in public utilities r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0207614934 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.463889654 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22422403043 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785193832636 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419773971949 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125291042222 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408788110991 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.