The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.
Smoking has always been considered as the real detriment to the people whether it is a passive smoking or an active one. Many people strongly assert that smoking should be prohibited in the communal areas by the corresponding authorities. I completely disagree to the above mention point due to the reasons presented hereinafter.
Firstly, despite the fact that cigarette fume is proven to be dangerous, restriction to smoke in public places will indeed violate the mental health of those who smoke. Smoking is not a selective action as it happens to be a real chemical dependency for some long-term smokers. When the evil habit persists for many years, one cannot just quit for a day or even for two hours. The suitable situation was when my friend, Alexey, travelled from Moscow to Irkutsk by the train and was forbidden to smoke all the time equaling to 4 days! Therefore, administration should not disable smoking overnight without considering the citizens’ calmness and psychological health issues.
Moreover, drawing the line between a public place and the private property is quite difficult. If the Government is willing to introduce a taboo on smoking in public areas, they can declare a balcony public as it is facing the street. Corresponding to the Law, people are allowed to engage whatever they imagine in their property so that kind of prohibition can be estimated as a straight human rights violation. For example, for my friend Renata, smoking on the balcony led to the situation when her neighbors threatened to sue, as the corresponding law exists in Russia. Thereby, it can be inferred that smoking restriction bounds and sometimes offends human rights and freedoms.
In conclusion, several important arguments have been considered in favor of not prohibiting smoking, such as psychic health and the human rights interruption. Thus, I conclude that smoking in public areas should remain untouched to save peoples' calm, rights and freedom.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18238993711 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88137500194 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8705216901 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240723683932 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819970629991 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388660485972 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139107725212 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282102847595 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.