One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.
Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
A lot of people all over the world have found the eternal life an attractive idea. Nowadays medical services are approaching humans to live longer, average lifespan is gradually increasing and that allows individuals to make the most of their lives. I completely agree to this statement and believe that longevity will bring development and prosperity to the civilization.
First of all, a great number of talented persons will get a chance to prove themselves. It is not a secret that any skill needs time to promotion, so longer-lived geniuses are more likely to reach their full potential. Moreover, capable people will have enough opportunities to transfer gained knowledge to the rising generation. For example, such glorious writers as Lermontov and Pushkin could create more masterpieces, if medicine was approximated at least to modern science. Thus, longer lives would enable the society to achieve a higher level of development.
However, increases in longevity (with high probability?) may cause global overpopulation. Dramatically growing number of all nationalities leads to widespread shortage of sources. Both the neediest developing countries and advanced economies will have essential things in a short supply. For example, scientists presume that with the population of 9 billions the Earth can forfeit most of its subsoil assets by the year 2030. In other words, life exaction could be the end of the world.
To sum up, gain in longevity is an incredible opportunity to cultural and technological growth and expansion of human civilization. Spillover effect would be easily solved by best and brightest minds of the mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...ses in longevity with high probability? may cause global overpopulation. Dramatical...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, at least, for example, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3992248062 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05435456127 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68992248062 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3181411423 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0625 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984563082125 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269443960464 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336983656811 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547367115988 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508367435436 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.