The government should put more tax on unhealthy food to encourage people to eat healthy food.
Do you agree or disagree?
In the past people ate healthy food, however, nowadays it has been observed that individuals prefer to eat spicy and oily dishes. In line with this, a certain school of thoughts believes that government should impose high tax on junk food to ensure that people understand the value of healthy eating healthy food. I tend to disagree with this view. I believe that this is not practical solution to tackle the issue. In my discourse ahead, I will not only support my opinion with justifying reasons, but also highlight certain contradictory views that others in the society might possibly have.
The primary reason for my belief is that imposing high taxes on unhealthy food does not seem pragmatic to convince foodies to eat healthy food. It is evidently true that there are individuals who pay high bills if they get good according to their choice. For example, despite of introducing 2.5% additional tax on pizza by the Canadian government in 2019, still people prefer to eat it by paying additional charges. Another noteworthy reason for me to uphold my view is that execution of other initiatives would give better results to change folk’s eating habits. It is an undeniable truth that certain campaigns run by the local authority would help to aware educate people about dire consequences of eating unhealthy food. For instance, in 2018 the Indian government celebrated world health day by running campaign to sensitize mass about negatives of spicy food on their health which proved to be successful.
On the other hand, there are individuals who hold a contradictory view to the above discussion believe that the higher taxes on unhealthy imposed by bureaucrat convince people to eat food that is good for their health. One of the possible reasons for their inclination could be that high food price stops individuals to eat unhealthy food. Every individual in the society cannot afford costly food. So, they might opt food that is economic and healthy for their health. Their belief also originates from the fact that high taxes reduce interest of shopkeepers to sell unhygienic food. This is because owing to high rate, people would not spend money to eat costly food, so restaurant businessmen do not get enough profit that ultimately reduces their interest to sell unhealthy food.
To conclude, evidently there are those who think that the administrative department should impose high additional tax on unhealthy food in order to change people’s preference to eat healthy food. However, I disagree with this view and I am of the firm opinion that there are myriad other impactful measures that can be taken by the local
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: might; possibly
...ictory views that others in the society might possibly have. The primary reason for my beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'might'.
Suggestion: might
...ictory views that others in the society might possibly have. The primary reason for my beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03652968037 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61535834013 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.906899978 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.105263158 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386015135158 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133938906605 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10430006805 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266200948024 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217597858498 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.