Government should spend money to encourage of sport and art for school students rather than supporting professional sports and art performances for the general public.
Do you agree or disagree?
This is a duty of each government to find the needs of its society and dedicate enough and reasonable budget for development of them. In my point of view, the youth needs as futurist of country should have preceded. Therefor I totally agree with the statement of question and in the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most important of my reasons.
First, school is one of the most crucial places in society which have decisive role in nurturing youth’ talent. Sufficient time in a curriculum of school for art and sport can be beneficial for physically and mentally health. These activities can help students to express their emotions like interest, hate and anger so prevent from behavioral abnormalities like addiction. Sport and art activities can also motivate students and enhance their self-confidence. So, spending enough money to provide probable sport and art equipment can be a prospective plan to development of country.
Second, successful professional activities in international level needs some facilities including suitable hardware and individual infrastructure. Like farmers that cultivate the best seed to harvest the best product, government should have paid more attention to younger persons if they would like to have an acceptable level in global sport and art programs in future. On the other hands, government shouldn’t forget supporting of professional sport and art teams because they are not only, the agent of a country in world level now but also, the qualified teacher of younger people. Youth can take advantages of their experienced and knowledge.
To wrap it up, government should evaluate the requirements of society especially youth and dedicate enough budget to them if he would like to be professional and successful internationally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 361, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... level in global sport and art programs in future. On the other hands, government shouldn...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43416370107 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12189917839 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8565410441 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263448940964 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866167240436 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764863312724 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13393671609 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069517550039 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.