do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
it is more important to keep your old fiends than it is to make new friends.
The ability of communicate with others and getting friend undoubtedly is one the most important qualities among humans. We always try to make some friends in each times and places. some of these relations will remain and some do not. Since we influence our friends, I personally prefer to get familiar with new people besides keeping some of my close and good friends.
The most significant reason is that we need to broaden the circle of our friendships to learning new things, improving our characteristics and behaviors and the ability of communicates with others. In my opinion new friend bring new behavior, interests, experiences, thought, mind and generally new world with themselves. This is us who must choose whom we should keep in touch. New friendships can develop our outlook, nurture our talents and improve us in personal life if they choose accurately. In fact I think, we should keep good and valuable people close and get away from person who stop us on the journey of our goals.
In addition, although, the modern and advanced world ease our relationships but it makes us far from each other. Most of the time we just keep contact with our friends with short massages, calls and emails because we are too busy then we need some new friends beside older and close friends, who are reliable and familiar with our feelings and personality, to share our thoughts and also good or bad times.
In conclusion, recalling all the good memories with the old friends of ours would make us smile and relieve pressures in our life. They know us sometimes better than ourselves but we should enlarge the group of our friends. A new friend like an old one can be trustful and helpful person, can listen to our problems and have some good effects as well.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?it is more important to keep your old fiends than it is to make new friends. 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 66
- 21.09.2017 You have travelled by plane last week and your suitcase was lost. You have still heard nothing from the airline company. Write to the airline and explain what happened.Describe your suitcase and tell them what was in it.Find out what they are g 56
- 21.09.2017 You have travelled by plane last week and your suitcase was lost. You have still heard nothing from the airline company. Write to the airline and explain what happened.Describe your suitcase and tell them what was in it.Find out what they are g 56
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people ate only the local food produce by farmers.To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... some friends in each times and places. some of these relations will remain and some...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and have some good effects as well.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so, then, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79672131148 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.573538676 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2641957505 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16615158341 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676982303812 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371360072868 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11892815352 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210025732282 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.