Government has been allocating a large portion of funds on education. Some assert that funds should be allocated on leisure activities to a greater extent. In my opinion, government has already established a robust education system and therefore should now focus on creating more recreational facilities such as outdoor parks, community centres and clubs for physical and psychological reasons.
It is undeniable that funds have been allocated on education for the growth and prosperity of the country. Only if most of the populace is educated, a country is able to achieve its economic growth. Statistics shared by economists from developing and developed countries clearly points out the importance of education in various field that is imperative for the growth and pursuit of excellence.
Nonetheless, people who advocate allocation of funds towards leisure activities, rightly point out the physical and psychological effects on the populace. Not only does outdoor parks provide healthy living standards but also increases the life expectancy of an average individual. When people go for walking or jogging in open spaces provided by the government, they have a feeling of enjoyment and fulfillment. This pleasurable pastime eventually leads to stress free environment and people become more efficient and productive. In addition, community centres and clubs organize events that brings people from all walks of life closer. As they attend the functions and events organized by the social workers, people from different caste, race and religion interact and understand each other better. In this way, government can achieve a creating lasting relationships and bonds among people. Eventually, this leads to greater sense of satisfaction.
In conclusion, while both the views are commonly held in society, I personally believe that governments should spend a considerable sum of monies on leisure activities to encourage a healthy and peaceful life for its population.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58471760797 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01416617576 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614617940199 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3887212392 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.066666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109730003047 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034398982313 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401485247366 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751405326845 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478438947509 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.