The primary beneficiaries of the natural resources of a country are the governments and large corporations. Some say that individuals may not be able to restore the balance in the environment. As responsible human being who inhabit this beautiful planet it is collectively everyone's duty to safe guard the planet. However, in my opinion policy makers and large scale industries have a major role to play in creating an equilibrium.
Unequivocally, the detrimental effects of large scale mining in the land, and oil refineries in the seas are known to all. Every single talk in the recent World Economic Forum emphasized the need for urgent actions from all the nations to cut down the emission of carbon. For example, even a developing nation like India was able to increase the forest cover by over ten percent in just three years. Afforestation, recycling initiatives, and ban on plastic has contributed in increasing the number of trees. In addition, levying heavy taxes on precious metals such as titanium and platinum has curtailed their demand and thus less impact on mining.
Interestingly, many individuals are making changes in their life style and opting for a eco friendly mode of transport. For example, the number of commuters using smart bike has increased drastically over the last two years. In addition to being economical, these bikes are helping commuters maintain a healthy life style. However, to promote cycling to commute to work the government has to make special tracks in the roads for cycles. On the other hand companies need to provide parking spaces, shower rooms, and locker facilities to employees who cycle to work.
In conclusion, although individuals collectively can build a greener planet, I think law makers and corporate have a larger role to play in facilitating such efforts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...restore the balance in the environment. As responsible human being who inhabit thi...
^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nges in their life style and opting for a eco friendly mode of transport. For exa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16554054054 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92032428318 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652027027027 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7985409114 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113845990025 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344512202348 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330886752517 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588426317845 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387037707633 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.