Governments prohibit the underage children for getting full time jobs in certain countries Is it good thing or bad thing

With the growing population and increasing inflation rate, there is a group of people who make their children make ends meet from a very young age. This is a very common phenomenon in developing countries such as India and China. To put a stop at this practice, the governments have taken many initiatives and passed many new laws. This essay will discuss if steps taken to stop children to work have positive or negative impacts.
Firstly, child labor has emerged as one of the biggest threats to the children as it snatches away their rights of education and a dream of a happy childhood. Though not all of them are affected by it, children with a week financial background are the major contributor to it. Furthermore, as they are unable to obtain any formal education in childhood, the possibility of having a good future diminishes to a great extent. Hence, by restricting the underage children from work, governments have taken a wonderful step, which will help these underprivileged children to make their own dreams come true.
Next, undoubtedly child labor should be erased completely from the planet Earth but only the prohibition of children from work, doesn’t guarantee of better education and lifestyle. Hence, the governments should come up with a concrete plan to provide free education as well as better living conditions for these children.
Lastly, governments should also conduct a survey to know the reasons behind the child labor and if they are willingly doing this or unwillingly. If unwillingly, agencies should find out about the people behind it and put them behind the bars. This will also help the governments to stop child trafficking.
In essence, child labor is unacceptable in our civilized society should be tackled down completely. However, it is not possible until people and governments work together. Apart from this, these underprivileged children should also be encouraged to chase their dreams and also should be allowed to take any part-time work, which they actually need to fulfill their daily requirements.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, so, well, apart from, such as, as well as, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1369047619 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85781242154 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9426692045 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112433062852 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385083584147 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289084793004 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646021746374 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280679983213 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.