Governments prohibiting the underage children for getting full-time jobs in certain countries. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years governments of some countries have imposed legislation against children’s full-time employment. From my perspective, I strongly support the move of those countries.
Firstly, it is a responsibility of any government to ensure the future of all kids. It is undeniably true that the job market is increasingly getting competitive and to compete in such environment one has to acquire degree with high grades. Therefore, if a child spends most of his time working in a factory or a restaurant, he even cannot find an admission in university due to his low performance in high school which would ultimately damage his chance of getting job. Considering this fact, governments have made very reasonable decision.
Secondly, the enforcement of this law ultimately makes parents more responsible towards the future of their offspring. Since the law can punish the parents as well if they force their kids to find job, they are discouraged to compel their kids to be employed. As a result, parents work harder and make enough money to support the needs of their family; meanwhile, send their children to study. For example, the Department of Home Affairs of India has recently issued the report which has revealed that out of 500,000 full-time working children, who were forced to work by their parents, two-thirds of them have already started going to school after the implementation of the law, and parents are covering their tuition fees by working overtime.
In conclusion, banning in full-time child work is deemed positively all over the world. This regulation will help to ensure the bright future of children as they are likely to finish their higher education which has become a major criteria for a job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...gher education which has become a major criteria for a job.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13427561837 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90583141458 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.336244486 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178061412751 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063797299461 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039523278876 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119682365378 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347995803233 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.