A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some group believe that animal should not be used for human usages, while others think that they are essential for people to provide requirements and survival. This assay takes a look at both sides of view and will analysis it.
Despite exploitation of animals, some people believe that it is acceptable for several reasons: Firstly it's thought that animals do not suffer pain as much as humans, so they can tolerate pains that humans cannot. This theory convinced people to apply them in various aspects. Moreover, scientists apply animal in several laboratory examinations that leads to provide medicine and vaccines which are protected them from numerous diseases. Regarding to having a health society is association with health animal, this part of findings are vital. For example, based on similarity in immune response between human and mouse, a wide range of medical researches are done on mouse and rat and the results are appropriate for animals, as well.
On the other hand, advocators refuse the theory about how much animal suffer in painful situations. They believe keeping in cages or kill them to provide food is as painful as humankinds. It's believed that all kind of creatures are respectable and every abuses are banned. Furthermore, people can gain same amount of vitamins and minerals from herbal products instead of meet. For instance, grain contain vitamin A and E even more than beef or chicken meet. Therefore, when obtaining essential factors are feasible by these kind of products, why an animal must be killed?
All in all, I suppose animals are essential for people to promote knowledge and find novel approaches in science but they are replaceable in part of food when there are numerous main sources to meal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ining essential factors are feasible by these kind of products, why an animal must be kill...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07665505226 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56980393046 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620209059233 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4252682629 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292334966527 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851758185766 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830403802594 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175940045492 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501227698123 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.