With the growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem.To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

With the growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is an undeniable fact that growing population is an uncontrollable phenomenon and it has raised certain issues as a consequence. One of the biggest concern taken strength is the availability of food. Some people believe that GM foods can be a good solution to this problem. I completely disagree to this argument. I will validate my stance with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
Predominantly, feeding growing population is an alarming situation. However, providing GM foods as a substitute to natural food resources is like playing with people's health and life. Population health and quality of food is of paramount importance. Genetically modified can never ever replace natural food as it does not contain required vitamins and minerals essential for human body. For instance, an orange fully grown on tree is enriched with all the natural ingredients such as vitamin C & calcium. Whereas, an orange grown artificially in limited time is just a modified food alternative with no benefits.
On the contrary, people are increasingly consuming GM foods; despite of being aware of all the adverse affects it can cause on health. Government should play vital role in this perspective. Government should educate people to adopt farming as a profession as most of the farmers are uneducated; particularly in the third world countries. For instance, in Pakistan; if people face unemployment, they can chose farming as a business which will not only provide natural food source for their families but also give monetary benefits.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, i opine that people should identify the means of growing natural foods resources instead of relying on GM foods as an alternative. Population should be controlled and other ways should be explored where quality of food can be attained coming from natural sources.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ngredients such as vitamin C & calcium. Whereas, an orange grown artificially in limite...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
...; if people face unemployment, they can chose farming as a business which will not on...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to farm'.
Suggestion: to farm
...eople face unemployment, they can chose farming as a business which will not only provi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...capitulate the aforementioned argument, i opine that people should identify the m...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, whereas, for instance, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3186440678 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05121063221 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0335176853 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228025777751 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080407483903 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543256092951 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142039143012 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572491058394 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.