Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.
Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children?
There is no gainsaying that topic of child vaccination drags immediate attention owing to its uniqueness and versatility. One group of people assert that parents should be given the liberty to decide if they want to get their child immunized, whereas, other group of people is of the opinion that parents should be bound by law for their kids vaccination. Let’s discuss both dimensions in detail before reaching to a final verdict.
To begin with, if we look back few decades, people suffered from different diseases they were not aware of. They died fighting those disease due to unknown cure. However, nowadays, with extensive research in medical sciences, we have established cure for almost all fatal diseases such as Cancer, Hepatitis etc. Some parents, however, still believe in the authenticity of home remedies and are reluctant in immunization of their kids. In this era, disease have become more fatal due to environmental changes as compared to past and hence, cannot be treated with home remedies anymore.
The idea of enforcing parents for vaccination is relatively absurd. A more rational approach is to run educational campaigns to achieve the goal of healthy masses. Such awareness campaigns would guide parents how these contiguous diseases can adversely affect their child’s health and growth. To elucidate it further, by vaccinating the child timely, they would prevent their child from any fatal disease proactively, that might have long lasting impact even after cure. For instance, Polio is a fatal disease, if not vaccinated timely till the age of 5 would give lifelong disability.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, I prefer the idea of giving freedom to parents to decide vaccination of their kids. Definitely, this idea would be backed up by extensive awareness campaigns and by highlighting the harmful consequences intact to it. Law enforcement would bring sense of threat and reason of anger in parents, so it should not be adopted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this disease' or 'those diseases'?
Suggestion: this disease; those diseases
...y were not aware of. They died fighting those disease due to unknown cure. However, nowadays,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, still, then, whereas, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27129337539 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84555526506 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602523659306 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7918951473 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194654572407 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570400233658 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410939260702 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11786112567 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288330463161 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.