You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.
Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
You should write at least 250 words.
Humans have found prevention for many illnesses and have created vaccines for those. Many believe that it should be compulsory for parents to immunise children against preventable diseases, while many others believe that it should be optional. This essay will discuss both the viewpoints and why compulsory vaccination is a better alternative.
Some parents suggest that immunisation against certain infections reduces a child's ability to generate natural defence. Many researchers have found that some virus mutate every year and if we leave our body to defend itself against them, our body will be able to create new antibodies which can fight against similar illnesses. For example, some tribes in Indonesia are unaffected by deadly swine flu as their immune system has generated proper defence mechanism against various strains of the virus. So, in many cases avoiding prevention of certain disease seems quite appealing.
On the other hand, opinions of mandatory immunisation have a strong voice amongst parents and authorities. Since many of the diseases are preventable by vaccines and most of these agents causing the infections do not vary their characteristics over time, it is advised by most doctors and scientists that we can wipe out such disease by vaccinating every child. For example, Polio has been eradicated from most of the countries by creating laws to mandate its immunisation. Since prevention of any disease is better than cure, it looks to be a better choice to make a mandate for immunisation against common diseases.
Medical science has found many ways to prevent different infections, but the adoption depends on how we chose to use it. The essay highlighted the opposing views for compulsory vaccination versus and optional one. To conclude, I believe that the benefits of mandatory immunisation outweighs those where the choice is left to individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, for example, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35906040268 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84025267691 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9532616839 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.071428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15437905836 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531214375667 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609455260986 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968909715146 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488122140284 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.