World population has been exponentially increasing for a few decades; as a result, it drives the need of crops around the world. Some countries try to solve this problem using genetic engineering technology on food which produces much higher quantity of crops than traditional way. For example, more than 80% of corn and soybean supply around the world are now genetically modified. However, there are some movements that try to impede the use of GM food due to health and economical concerns. In my opinion, I partially agree with the idea of GM food and this essay will explain my thought.
Genetic engineering already plays a vital role in increasing global food supply. It strengthens crops immunization and resistant to several diseases and pests; because of that, crops are grown up without the need of antibiotics or pesticides thus reducing the chance of residue after a harvest. More than that, genetic engineering also increases the quality of food by enlarging the crop which result in more product per area. It also allows growing crops in an area that was previously infeasible for that particular corp.
On the other hand, GM food might create a monopoly or oligopoly economic. Generic engineering needs a large amount of initial investment; because of that, it needs to be patented so that the company can gain profit from its research. As a result, a farmer who relies on genetically modified seeds will also rely on a single corporation for a few decades until the parent becomes public domain. However, this pattern is not new because we already have an example in medical equipments and medicines.
In summary, GM food is vital for the future because of the increase in consumption from both human and livestocks. However, there is a risk of a few corporations to become world class food-lords that take control over global food market. Such situation must be prevented with proper regulation in both local and global level.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, in summary, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00923076923 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73144130408 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0868899128 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142343389375 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493126501266 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352975064527 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870962188614 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541194700464 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.