Recently, online shopping platforms have gained tremendous popularity due to which it is feared that retails in the urban and rural areas might close down permanently. In my opinion, this may not be the case as the availability of goods and the access to simple products are met only by visiting the local stores.
Firstly, most of the consumables, though simple and of a lower price, may not be available on online shopping platforms. Customers in the urban areas, usually prefer to use a brand of their choosing due to health benefits rather than purchasing an alternative on the internet which they might not be comfortable using. Furthermore, the cost of a few products sometimes, are quite higher than their market rates which might drive the customers to reach out to the retails. In a survey conducted by Amazon, more than a few dozen of their customers have reported returning goods for reimbursement as they did not find it of their liking.
Secondly, people in the rural areas who do not have constant access to the internet, have no choice but to opt for visiting local grocery stores. In many towns today, the internet facility is not yet prevalent due to the lack of technology consequently, a vast majority are not aware of the online shopping platforms. Hence, many still continue visiting their local supermarkets for fruits and vegetables as they find them to be more accessible. In an article published by The Times, an elderly retail goer expressed her gladness in being able to visit shops nearby her farm as she is able to purchase all of the items of her choice without struggling for the internet.
In conclusion, the boom in e-commerce may continue to increase but a majority of the customers still prefer to visit local stores. The freedom to select a product of their choice and access to goods is only met by having a shopping experience in the markets which I strongly support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rby her farm as she is able to purchase all of the items of her choice without struggling ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, may, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84451219512 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70845497675 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506097560976 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.2974036893 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105569072592 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434968575819 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512693337418 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685231508224 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267482466378 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.