Plants and animals plays a pivotal role in balancing the food chain of our planet. In ancient time, some plants and animals were considered to be poisonous and dangerous respectively for humans. But, nowadays, humans perform a lot of cruel and dangerous activities, which have a negative impact on flora and fauna. Some people believe that this situation cannot be overcome while others think that some actions can bring about a change. I will discuss both these views in the forthcoming paragraphs first and give my opinion in the last.
On one hand, people says it is impossible to make a change in negative impact of human activities because animals are killed by humans in order to design their luxurious accessories like leather shoes, belts, jackets and many more. This human desire of luxury lifestyle has already lead to extinction of many species of fauna. Moreover, uncountable tree are cut down by the humans in order to make extra space for people living and establishing new industries. The major reason behind deforestation is the growing population and industrialization. Thus, many species of flora and fauna are on the verge of extinction by man.
On the other hand, others thinks that storm actions taken by the government could help saving the lives of many plants and animals as they plays a pivotal role in the environment. For example, people with hunting habits should be penalized or imprisoned. Also, building houses and industries in mountains should be prohibited. Thus, harsh steps are required to be taken as early as possible.
In my opinion, it will be impossible for humans to survive on Earth without plants and animals as they provide basic needs of living like food, oxygen, et cetera. That is why, it is not too late to bring about a change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... desire of luxury lifestyle has already lead to extinction of many species of fauna....
^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...ions taken by the government could help saving the lives of many plants and animals as...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
...ives of many plants and animals as they plays a pivotal role in the environment. For ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94333333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67514277916 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7977466012 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408860215458 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108691659962 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103835185766 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226492578493 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124849046846 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.