With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.
What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?
How can this be solved?
It is argued that the growth in population, along with the enlargement of metropolitan areas during recent years cause a decrease in the number of natural beauty objects. The ever increasing number of people living on earth may in future lead to a loss of many natural sightseeing places. This essay will firstly discuss the advantages of keeping natural places of interest safe and secondly, will suggest solutions to the above-mentioned issue.
There are many positive impacts natural beauty spots have, including their effect on health and economy. First of all, such places help people obtain mental stability and peace, which is especially important for those, who live in big cities most of the time. Secondly, this kind of vacation spots can be a key for the development of tourism and help out a country’s economy, as a result. Hot springs, snowy mountains, cliffy beaches and endless forests are what people look for shall they want to rest their minds from daily routine.
There are various steps that can be taken to solve the problem of damaging natural beauty spots, such as control over the number of population and usage of living areas more wisely. During recent years, the number of population has been increasing in highest rates ever in the history. As a measure of dealing with the phenomenon Governments may use some birth controlling tools. For instance, Chinese government has set taxes for every next child born, starting from the second. Another way to reduce the treat is using living space more efficiently, instead of enlarging cities at the expense of the nature. As an example, local authorities and those charged with governance may set limitations on living areas per person. For example a single person can only have a large apartment for additional charges or taxes.
To conclude, in my opinion increasing population is a possible treat to spots of natural beauty worldwide, however there are several actions that can be taken to avoid any fatal result.
- Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are becoming more isolated.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads Do you agree or disagree 95
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 87
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d of vacation spots can be a key for the development of tourism and help out a co...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the highest'.
Suggestion: in the highest
...umber of population has been increasing in highest rates ever in the history. As a measure...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g in highest rates ever in the history. As a measure of dealing with the phenomeno...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07272727273 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62372449224 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8533448574 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276091339795 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840486773505 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730780357324 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170060790514 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027824872777 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.