The increase in tourism has led to the destruction of the environment, thus tourism ought to be banned in certain areas.
What is your opinion?
Environmental destruction has been caused by the rise in tourism and hence, suggested that it should be banned in specific areas. I completely disagree with the statement as with the appropriate actions it can be controlled. This essay will first focus how some ways that would work in the revival of the environment and then concentrate on the benefits of tourism.
Firstly, negative impacts caused by humans could be managed by some stringent actions. People generate trash as well as disturb the beauty of the natural place with their involvement. However, special arrangements for tourist places, which involve strict laws and rules, would help in reducing these problems. It will not only control the number of visitors but also made it compulsory for them to follow these rules. For instance, ID check and banning plastic things at visiting places reduces the damage to a higher extent. Hence these actions improve environmental destruction.
Secondly, the contribution of tourism to the economy of a country is undeniable. Tourists across the world during their visit spend money on different activities which will be added to the income of that place, moreover, these visitors support local businesses and generate job opportunities for many. For example, craftwork by locals is highly liked by visitors and they purchased different things and thus adds to the economy of a country.
In conclusion, admittedly, tourism has harmed the environment but it enhances the economy of a nation every year and with strong rules and regulations its damage can be controlled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... reduces the damage to a higher extent. Hence these actions improve environmental des...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.312 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84342328892 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4344952902 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.153846154 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158901522427 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551088501451 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612054329066 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10712373671 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649420298732 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.