Nowadays developing countries are facing a big problem due to loosing a large amount of specialists who are travelling to improved countries. This is resulting in lack of experts in less developed countries, therefore government needs to support educators and experts financially and provide motivative environment to work in.
In recent years there has been a rising number of experts like doctors and school educators who have decided to move from less developed countries to improved countries such as Europe. In fact, it is happening because people do not get paid enough and have undesirable working conditions. Other countries seem more attractive as they have sparkling working opportunities with higher salary. For example, according to the Egyptian Medical Syndicate over the past three years, more than 10,000 doctors have left Egypt due to low pay, poor medical facilities and a lack of supplies in government hospitals.
To tackle this issue, government needs to take a step and figure out what they can offer to keep the valued specialists. Providing better working facilities and giving motivative pay would be the main options to keep the specialists valued in their home country. Locals need experienced doctors and education providers to keep their country functioning. For example, in Estonia doctors salary has been raised 2% to prevent surgeons leaving the country, moreover, the government gives every year 20 000 euros to supply the hospitals with new facilities.
In conclusion, professionals are leaving poorer countries to find better life quality including higher wages. It is government responsibility to keep local experts by offering competitive salary and better working conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alued in their home country. Locals need experienced doctors and education provid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64230769231 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08631978617 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5473442976 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222640537314 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804849509658 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345330923142 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123875733179 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329631615594 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.