Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is thought that the best way to tackle traffic jams and pollution in cities is to heighten the price of petrol; however, I am completely disagree because there are better solutions to be considered.
While people are using huge amount of petrol for traveling by their cars. And raising prices may force them to use public transportation, there are social and economic circumstances lies beneath this method. By increasing the price of petrol we would definitely encounter with increasing fee of transporting goods. This vicious circle would rise the price of everything in the market; therefore, people have to pay more for living. In addition, people's dissatisfaction and anger would cause a lot of social disobedience. They would think that the situation is unfair and become frustrated and when it becomes more critical, they would act against the law and protest. subsequently, chaos rises.
Alternatively, this problem can be solved by heightening the quality of public transportation. Clean and tidy buses with a special line in the streets which would enable them faster, gives us a good convincing illustration about this subject. In addition accessibility of stations and public vehicles is a unique feature of this method which is can be extended , as people can easily travel across the city; Therefore, putting more emphasis on raising qualities would encourage people to use public transportation and this can ease the problems of urban life such as traffic and air pollution.
In conclusion, I think raising the price of petrol can make the situation worse and government can handle the problem by offering upgraded public transportation means such as buses and metro which has enough capacity and capability to be developed and be updated
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ice of petrol; however, I am completely disagree because there are better solutions to b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Subsequently
... would act against the law and protest. subsequently, chaos rises. Alternatively, this prob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ing illustration about this subject. In addition accessibility of stations and public ve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of this method which is can be extended , as people can easily travel across the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21554770318 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97359102811 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583038869258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.9292188956 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137867186167 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536631923326 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577671832305 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105534983036 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546125021345 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.