Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?what other measures do you think might be effective?

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?

what other measures do you think might be effective?

In today's busy, modern and technology oriented world, each individual prefers having personal means of transport. This upsurge in vehicle count have generated dangerous trafficking and global warming issues ubiquitously. It is believed that most effective approach to curtail this dilemma is elevation in fuel cost. However, I am in consummate discord that despite of seeking this approach several other easily accessible and cost effective energy sources can be utilised to overcome this problem in a pragmatic manner.

Indisputably, petrol nowadays is among the heavily consumed and demanded energy source. Increasing its cost to such an extent that is becomes unaffordable will give rise to social and economic issues. Hence, shutting down personal automobile usage and leaving citizens with no choice, except to avail public transport.In addition, aspiring public transport demand will result in rise in pollution and global warming followed by drastic effects on human health. Furthermore, this policy will elevate taxes, food rates, transport costs and deter businesses. Ultimately effecting both personal and professional lives of individuals.

Implementing green power as means for fulfilling public demand is still a far better approach and needs special consideration. Its not only cheap but also certainly has fewer harmful effects on environment because it does not results in emission of harmful gasses and toxins such as CCL4, CO, NO as a byproduct in air. Moreover, this will decrease pollution by 70-80%. Government on the other hand should support interventions supporting green and nuclear power for betterment of planet earth by all means possible. For instance, recent discoveries have proposed usage of hydro, solar and wind sources as an alternative for harmful fuels. This policy will also have positive effects on world's economy.

In conclusion, it is highly debatable that aspiring fuel costs shall benefit our society in numerous ways. Instead, promoting and implementing usage of nuclear and green power for betterment of society is a pragmatic approach and should taking into consideration by government. This strategy has known to serve beneficent and promising ramifications for community, peoples health, environment and global economy.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 498, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pragmatic manner" with adverb for "pragmatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...an be utilised to overcome this problem in a pragmatic manner. Indisputably, petrol nowadays is am...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...hoice, except to avail public transport.In addition, aspiring public transport dem...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ects on environment because it does not results in emission of harmful gasses and toxin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...ful gasses and toxins such as CCL4, CO, NO as a byproduct in air. Moreover, this w...
^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...licy will also have positive effects on worlds economy. In conclusion, it is highly...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67741935484 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88099847578 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5334303578 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585462079043 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187880388662 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0186940913578 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0341577044127 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231426698047 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.