Individuals can do nothing to change society. New developments can be only brought about by governments and large institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been a matter of debate since long that changes in society can only be brought by a governing body and large institutions rather than individuals. Although it can never be denied that a ruling party have the power and resource to bring new developments whereas in my opinion both government and individuals need to work hand in hand to bring positive changes in the society which can make this world a better living place. In this essay I will elucidate my opinion with relevant examples.
First and foremost, ministry globally have always been policy makers and facilitator for its society. They can provide world class facilities like education, health care and security for their people. However, it is for an individual to use such facilities and innovate to bring changes in the society. For instance, Singapore government is providing funding to some brilliant individuals from National University of Singapore to build its first communication satellite. Similarly in developing countries like India, authority is facilitating resources to individuals to start manufacturing space components in india. Therefore it is evident that individuals and government need to work jointly to bring new developments in the society.
Large corporations have funding and resources to bring new developments in the society. To exemplify, when we look at specific examples from companies like Apple it can be seen that individuals like Steve Jobs have made a difference by inventing communication gadgets like MacBook’s, Phones.
To conclude, it is evident from above examples that although government and large corporations have a larger role to play to trigger a change in the society however they must co-work with individuals to bring a positive change which can be reaped by our future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...uild its first communication satellite. Similarly in developing countries like India, aut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...anufacturing space components in india. Therefore it is evident that individuals and gove...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33916083916 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06167550735 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1755577242 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274844275672 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105336239577 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703887173538 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172606547587 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405888888948 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.