International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is evident that globalization has made it possible to travel across the world conveniently and comfortably which encourages people to explore and visit the novel destinations. In my opinion, I believe that this trend proved negative for the local communities as well as the environment inspite of the advantage of this to the economy of a nation.
Admittedly, tourism plays a vital role in the growth of the country's economy. Some countries such as Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia largely depends on the tourism sector because it contributes around 30% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Millions of people across the world visit these tourist spots annually, and they spend a lot of money to buy tickets, stay in hotels and shopping in the local popular markets which ultimately lead to the inflow of international capital to the concerned country.
Despite this, it has affected the lives of regional dwellers and the biosphere reserves of the place badly. The natural ecosystem of the place gets disturbed when more and more people interfere in it. To illustrate it with an example, recently Kedarnath in India was heavily flooded due to the deforestation caused by builders and governments to construct hotels ad roads in hilly areas, and there was approximate loss of 5000 lives. Apart from this, residents of tourist places have to suffer a lot due to the scarcity of available resources for them. Shimla, for instance, in northern India faces shortage of water for local inhabitants as most of the water is being used by hotels and restaurants.
In conclusion, inspite of the fact that the financial position of the country's economy gets strengthened with the tourism sector, but it has detrimental effects on the local lives and ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12456747405 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82733900676 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581314878893 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.921431485 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.636363636 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13223922572 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04285922737 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294991982139 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718659050493 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206106082568 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.