Global tourism has become popular in the last few decades and it has various beneficial aspects for both travellers and the place they visited. This essay will discuss why the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, it is obvious that the cost of international travelling is expensive for most travellers, especially during holiday seasons. The extra cost can be a heavy burden for a middle-class family and it causes the lack of opportunity to leisure in abroad. In addition, once a country becomes famous for its tourism, there is a risk of increasing crimes due to people from around the world.
Whereas, travelling has a lot of positive impacts on visitors and a country's economy. A greater amount of money that is used by travellers is one of the main resources for the country if it puts efforts on the industry to encourage people to visit their country. Moreover, the money gathered from travellers supports the country in a range of ways. For example, it is able to develop the quality of a nation's lifestyle further as well as providing better services for visitors. In addition, international travelling is always a stimulating activity to experience something new and unique from a different culture. Travellers gain a lot of experiences that would never happen in their homeland. This makes people more diversity.
In conclusion, global travelling enhances a country's development not only people's values even though travelling has negative sides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... it is able to develop the quality of a nations lifestyle further as well as providing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n though travelling has negative sides.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19166666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95785207353 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2355368848 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8461538462 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296236756677 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960781629256 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651377963966 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176946850142 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675465421922 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.