The internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Nowadays, the internet has become a major need of every person as it has a plethora of information. However, sometimes, the data is not correct and cause some distraction among people. I strongly agree with the statement as the wrong contents of web pages has some negative outcomes. In this essay, I will discuss the repercussions of inaccurate available information on the internet along with some examples.
Firstly, the incorrect information on the internet could adversely impact on the performance of the person. In other words, the inappropriate content of various websites has triggered the mind towards the wrong activities, which would probably induce the negativity. According to a recent article published in The Guardian, for instance, teenagers are more prone to use some precarious websites as they could not able to differentiate between wrong and right. In the long run, they become drug addicts and indulge in suicidal attempts. Hence, the unsuitable content of internet has some undeniable consequences.
Secondly, unnecessary online knowledge has sometimes reduced the accuracy of the material given. To be more precise, the unwanted data has been given on the pretext of the educational context, which would hamper a searcher to find particular results. For illustration, the youtube.com contains the undesired videos with some attractive titles, that insist the viewer to gain knowledge from them. Nevertheless, these such visuals have nothing related to the headings. Therefore, these lack clarity and perfection.
To sum up, the internet has provided ample knowledge along with various unsuitable contents. It has been categorically mentioned that the avoidable material of some pages could stunt the performance of an individual and ended up with invalid results. The government should restrict to publish these websites from online pages as well as vigilant towards their ill impacts on the population.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55218855219 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96794423642 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3202675692 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19925223004 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562230672353 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599259259627 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115415480083 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927214595235 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.