There has been a great deal of people who strongly reckon talent's people is completely related to genetic and in their view of point, sports champion or prominent musicians are supposed to be genetically talented. however, there are some people who are apposed to this idea and inclined to consider the effect of training as well. This essay deals with for and against this controversial topic.
On the one hand, the impact of genetic on everything specially art and sports can not be neglected. folk who are born with especial talents are more likely to be more successful in comparison with others. Firstly, the amount of time which is needed to be spent on a particular item is less. For example, one of my friend was going to take a part in a crucial entrance exam and in spite of spending the least time could achieve the best result and it was because of being so talented in mathematics. Secondly, for having a thing done less energy is essential. So, people come more eager to do special thing like playing musics and so forth.
On the other hand, a part of society are not in favor of mere talent and they feel that every body is deserved to be the best in case of being highly trained. There are a number of reason which could be given to defend such a claim. The most important reason is that human can be educated in spite of other creature. So, it must be considered as an important factor for making progress. In addition, the people who are trained are more likely to become victorious because they become familiar with the basic of every thing better.
In conclusion, there are two different viewpoint on this subject and based on the above mentioned points, I prefer to support the viewpoints which is for being trained in order to learn a skill because it makes more sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...re supposed to be genetically talented. however, there are some people who are apposed ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Folk
...ly art and sports can not be neglected. folk who are born with especial talents are ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'viewpoints'?
Suggestion: viewpoints
... In conclusion, there are two different viewpoint on this subject and based on the above ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'viewpoint' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'viewpoints'.
Suggestion: viewpoints
... In conclusion, there are two different viewpoint on this subject and based on the above ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 13.1623246493 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59316770186 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43262873739 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9162594826 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229238945447 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746206432469 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259379430363 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129732998272 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455623463102 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.