In recent decades, the use of electronic devices has become essential in people's daily life. While some people believe that the early use of computers is deleterious for children, others argue that it has an undeniable number of merits. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give a reasoned opinion.
On one side of the argument, computers can have some detrimental health and moral effects on unguided children. Firstly, spending many hours in front of an electronic screen will affect the child's sight which may lead to some hazardous vision diseases in his/her childhood. Secondly, computers can help teenagers to reach some violence or sexual contents that will be unsuitable for their ages. As a result of this, parents should keep an eye on their children so as to prevent them from being introduced to improper material.
On the flip side, the early use of computers will help children to acquire essential technical skills and gain substantial amounts of knowledge. Since most of the jobs require an employee who is comfortable with using computers, children who are practicing using it from their childhood can show some intriguing skills that will distinguish them from their competitors. Furthermore, thanks to the internet, tremendous amounts of information has become reachable is such a few seconds. For instance, if people search for anything starting with a food recipe and ending with sophisticated scientific research, they will find numerous numbers of articles and data sources related to their topic.
To sum up, if children use these electronic devices in an incorrect method, it will have some prejudicial impact on them. Whereas using these machines with a parental guide, not only will offer them some crucial computer skills, but it will also connect them to an ultimate source of cognition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ts should keep an eye on their children so as to prevent them from being introduced to i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: COMFORTABLE_WITH_VBG[1]
Message: Use simply 'comfortable using'.
Suggestion: comfortable using
... of the jobs require an employee who is comfortable with using computers, children who are practicing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19594594595 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71186790577 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8143261314 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.307692308 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291234357795 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101324385456 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588639973976 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181512847266 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105959094122 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.