Nowadays, the idea of hyper-markets becomes more popular and convenient for most people. As a result of this, many families resort to buying all of their needs from one of these markets which led to a significant loss in the number of profits that are made by the town centers. Consequently, these small shops will bring their business to an end, once they run out of money. Personally, I find that the demerits outweigh the merits of this phenomenon.
On one side of the argument, the idea of having the hyper-markets out of the town has many advantages. Firstly, it will reduce traffic congestion and offer many parking places that are usually occupied by customers. Secondly, since the family can buy all of their needs from a single place, they will save the effort of traveling from one point to another. Finally, those markets always offer some discounts on various kinds of products that will help the customers to save their money.
On the flip side, if these town centers went out of business, many employees would lose their jobs and people would travel long distances for the sake of buying their basic needs. To clarify, if these small shops do not make a considerable amount of profit, they will shut down their stores and fire all of the employees. Furthermore, people will have to cover tens of kilometers so as to reach one of those hyper-markets which will be considered as a squander of time.
Having looked to both sides, hypermarkets have many advantages that seem helpful to many people. Whilst, the closure of the town center not only will result in many jobless people, but it will also oblige the people to travel to distant places even to buy a basic item.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ey will shut down their stores and fire all of the employees. Furthermore, people will hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e will have to cover tens of kilometers so as to reach one of those hyper-markets which ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...per-markets which will be considered as a squander of time. Having looked to both sides...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75850340136 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52903222198 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1870740118 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.615384615 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159490128358 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06070336113 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601376238925 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1072966506 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021979805979 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.