In today's fast paced era, all individuals have a desire to possess materialistic things like a car, television and refrigerator. As per my view, this phenomenon has innumerable benefits; however, a few drawbacks also exist. This essay tends to highlight these in the upcoming paragraphs.
The first and foremost advantage of owning such expensive household items is that it has made the life very easy and convenient for the people. The commuting time has been saved to a large extent, if the individuals use their own vehicle making them use the time for productive work. Besides this, television has transformed the way the information is received these days, owing to the communication via satellites. Thus it has become a necessity in the modern life. Similarly, refrigerator has helped to preserve the eatables and increased their shelf life for consumption. This has proved to be major invention in the current times, where people tend to store their cooked and uncooked food for longer periods, thus enabling them to focus more on the work without worrying for food too much.
On the contrary, the electrical gadgets like fridge and television has made people lethargic, as most of the time people spend their free time watching television instead of socializing around. Additionally, the growing consumption of refrigerated food has also posed health issues to a large section of society as food loses its natural nutrition. While cars have contributed a lot towards environmental pollution besides creating traffic congestion.
To conclude, although there are several disadvantages of owning the gadgets like Tv, refrigerator and motor vehicle like car, but I perceive that the advantages of using them has more weightage because the inventions if used optimally can prove to be boon for the society in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ng to the communication via satellites. Thus it has become a necessity in the modern...
^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worrying about'?
Suggestion: worrying about
... them to focus more on the work without worrying for food too much. On the contrary, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ty as food loses its natural nutrition. While cars have contributed a lot towards env...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on besides creating traffic congestion. To conclude, although there are several ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, similarly, so, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24149659864 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92604993886 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9542683029 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934967316062 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284711211703 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392844291789 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056681432663 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366939108395 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.