It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinionWhat sort of punishment should parents and t

It is undeniable that children should be taught to distinguish between right and wrong in their early childhood. Some people opine that punishment is the traditional method for teaching their wards to make out a difference righteous and erroneous. This essay will argue why punishment is entirely unnecessary despite some potential benefits.
The major reason why a bunch of people claim that punishing is the best method in order to teach their children about right and wrong is that there are plethora of mistakes a child make in distinguishing between these two since he or she is not mature enough to imagine its outcomes. That is why, a little punishment can help them to choose the correct option and not repeating the mistake in the future. Moreover, the children of current contemporary world as compared to those of previous centuries are found to be more stubborn and arrogant. For instance, a recent study shows that 21% of wards in India are relented to punishment because of their repetitive nature to choose wrong options. Also, some mothers can also stop their sons or daughters in order to help them in making right choices. Thus, children are more likely to get punished if they make wrong choices and for some parents, it does help.
However, punishment may not be the best method to guide a child in differentiating between correct and incorrect. Despite the minor advantage mentioned above, the idea that it is needed is completely preposterous because wards often get mentally sick; tend to be more exposed to the diseases like unnecessary fear, loss of mental ability, et cetera. For example, a survey was conducted by World Health Organization in 2010 in United States of America which yielded a result that children striking with punishment in frequent intervals as compared to those who do not, are more likely to be mentally sick and less able to understand the situations. Thus, this system is not applicable in case of children.
In conclusion, punishment for making such decisions is not only irrational but can lead to bad consequences. In my opinion, this is definitely not a valid option.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ct option and not repeating the mistake in future. Moreover, the children of current cont...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 608, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relented'.
Suggestion: relented
...dy shows that 21% of wards in India are relent to punishment because of their repetiti...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 676, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
... of their repetitive nature of choosing wrong options. Also, some mothers can also st...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99435028249 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77280860393 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4147199268 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238273572046 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847887904913 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435739993926 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144709106335 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494227487689 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.