It is necessary for parents to attend a parenting training course to bring their children up.
Do you agree or disagree?
Time is changing and so is the preponderant role of parent training programs in socially acceptable upbringing of children. Whether guardians require parenting courses or not has sparked a heated debate the world over. It is sternly recommended by this essay that parents desperately need training in improving their parental skills inasmuch as such practical courses can enhance adults’ awareness about the influential methods of fostering kids as well as building a healthy relationship with them. Throughout the following paragraphs, these conspicuous points will be meticulously scrutinized to rationally advocate this logical viewpoint.
For one, introducing actionable ways of cultivating children is one of the conspicuous merits of participating in courses on proper parenting. Take a 15-year old teenager, spending a hefty amount of his time passively playing computer games instead of doing physical activities day in, day out, culminating in a family quarrel, as an illustration. This glaringly apparent instance exemplifies that should his parents take the parenting sessions, without a shadow of a doubt, they will be capable of dealing effectively with this devastatingly complicated problem. It is, thus, essential for mothers and fathers to be taught how to nurture their children and efficiently settle parent-child conflicts.
More significantly, aside from providing parents with efficient approaches to surmount practically numerous obstacles with their kids, forming a close-knit family, notwithstanding the generation gap between family members, is another beneficial effect of taking part in courses on children upbringing. The adolescent touched upon earlier, to illustrate, might have difficulty having an intimate talk with his father about his relationship problem at school, owing to the lack of mutual understanding, stemming from age difference. By shedding a light on this example, it is crystal clear that the aforementioned courses can act as a precursor for parents to understand their offspring to a great extent. It is, therefore, vital for parents to be supplied with parenting courses.
To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis of the undeniable virtues of better parenting courses in terms of teaching parents how to address various issues in their family as well as fortify their familial bonds, it can be rationally concluded that it should be mandatory for parents to attend ample constructive courses. It is, hence, hoped these significant points will be taken into account by parents in the foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally advocate this logical viewpoint. For one, introducing actionable ways of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
...omputer games instead of doing physical activities day in, day out, culminating in a famil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iently settle parent-child conflicts. More significantly, aside from providing...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o be supplied with parenting courses. To recapitulate, after careful situation...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7421875 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19280604119 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.49443693 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331408017072 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120883986882 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737163929023 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212076875211 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181134002281 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.