It is necessary for parents to attend parenting training course to bring their children up. Do you agree or disagree?

Time is changing and so is the paramount significance of children’s upbringing the world over. Whether participating guardians in parenting educational classes is mandatory or not has sparked a heated debate. The importance of this trend is stringently advocated by this essay due to the stern requirement to current manners to train offspring as well as the lack of grandparents to get a helping hand from in this indispensable subject matter. Throughout the following paragraphs, these essential points will be meticulously scrutinized to support this rational viewpoint.

For one, it is argued that children should be nurtured by centering their parents’ utmost attention on the current methods of upbringing. Take a rural family far away from cutting-edge technology, attempting arduous to raise their vibrant 5-year boy by traditional behavioral patterns, as an illustration. Doing so, this innocent child will, without a shadow of a doubt, be extremely vulnerable to some virtual communications in social media networks. This glaringly apparent instance clearly exemplifies that fostering children without the aim of parenting training courses not only can be so difficult, but it can act as a precursor to putting children in some hazardous perils. It, hence, deems undeniably obligatory for parents to attend training programs to raise their children in an acceptably decent way.

More significantly, nowadays, thanks to nuclear families’ structure, people from all walks of life are unfortunately deprived of reaping the benefits of grandparents’ constructive advice to bring up their newly born children. In the event of some harshly urgent situations like when a little child is choking if her immature parents were not well trained on how to obviate this insurmountable difficulty, an adversely dreadful situation will be created. This is clearly demonstrated by this example that in today's’ world to compensate for the lack of experienced grandparents taking some parenting training courses seem highly compulsory to raise toddlers. Thus, denying the vital role that these key courses can play in children’s upbringing is conspicuously superficial.

To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis of the importance of novel methods of children's rearing as well as the lack of skillful grandparents, it is agreed that participating in parental training courses can act as a catalyst to well grow up offspring by their parents. It is, therefore, hoped these striking facts will be taken into account by all responsible parents

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Time is changing and so is the paramou...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to support this rational viewpoint. For one, it is argued that children shou...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren in an acceptably decent way. More significantly, nowadays, thanks to ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inging is conspicuously superficial. To recapitulate, after careful situation...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64781491003 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37113965539 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598971722365 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2755522792 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.466666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307418780285 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100074574495 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768964229506 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18872609065 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760063651252 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.