A major initiative to save wildlife is being observed in recent years. Leveraging money on saving animals or concentrating on other problems in a country is always debatable. This essay will argue why a fixed amount should be invested for the wild inhabitants while the major focus of a government should be on taking care of important problems regarding the people.
Protecting wild creatures is always important, though there are other concerns in the society. Being a part of nature, government officials should focus on protecting the wild. Since deforestations are rampant in our society, it is high time that concerns regarding inhabitants of the forest should not be ignored. According to a survey, many wild creatures are killed by village people settled near the forests. Similarly, many villagers are also consumed by wildlife as their daily food. Since human beings are supposing to live in harmony with nature and its constituents, the government should give top priority for the well being and preservation of the wild in order to maintain stability in nature.
Being a country of such a huge population, it should be the prime focus to protect concerns related to the people of the country and not to wildlife. Solving poverty problems being the topmost priority, there are other aspects that need to be taken care such as corruption, human welfare, etc. Since, millions of farmers and labor workers die of poverty every year, the administration should take proper steps to prevent that. Although, taking care of wildlife is important, but masses who elected a government must have the right of getting importance than anyone else.
Protecting and thinking about the welfare of forest creatures are increasing nowadays. This essay argued that although, it is the wildlife who need a helping hand from the government, but being a part of a developing country, I strong agree that concerns related to common people have to be addressed first.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
Wildlife is an essential part of the our societies. Its absorbs many poisonous g...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this expenditure' or 'these expenditures'?
Suggestion: this expenditure; these expenditures
...o protect the wildlife. For some people these expenditure is required; whereas others believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun country seems to be countable; consider using: 'many countries'.
Suggestion: many countries
... with few basic needs for themselves in many country. Due to the rapid growth of populations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...meet the hunger. This trend has already make the wildlife worse and if we stay in th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ate in controlling the wildlife. So the governments money and regulations are expected to p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03384615385 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62929068063 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593846153846 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5833817062 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 7.06120827912 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191501988362 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578297032894 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077504112557 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118089451369 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623999574093 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.