It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives. How could robots be used in the future? Will this development be a positive or a negative development?
The development of robotic technology has grown beyond imagination in the recent past. Some scientists future of the human race will be in the hands of the robots, and this growth will help build a better future for us. This essay will discuss on how the robots are going to be a part of a human life and the impacts on its presence.
The robots are increasingly getting involved in the lives of the humans day by day. We will see the future of humanity hand in hand with these intelligent machines. The robots are being involved in our lives even as we speak. For instance in India there are restaurants that gets waited by the robotic servants. The robots will be potentially used in Medicine and in Armed forces. Tough the time when robots involvement in Armed forces will take a lot of time, but it will worth the risk when compared to losing a human life in the battles. It is clear that humans will not have place on earth in the next century without his intelligent Machines.
On the other hand the debate on whether this growth will have a positive impact or negative impacts is growing every day. These intelligent machines will overtake so many jobs in the next 50 years , this will be considered as a negative impact for the lives of millions. But the robots will also create more opportunities and will open gates to new entrepreneurial ideas. The robots will create a holistic place for us to live in. So the growth of robots despite having its downside will build a beautiful world for us to live in.
The robots are becoming irreplaceable aspect of human life. The World will grow and develop quite magnificently with help of these brilliant machines. Tough the robot’s growth will create issues in one point of time, we will have a beautiful life with them in our life. In conclusion our life without robots is inevitable so it is in our hands how we develop this machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ly getting involved in the lives of the humans day by day. We will see the future of h...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ertake so many jobs in the next 50 years , this will be considered as a negative i...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hands how we develop this machines.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64117647059 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5402632307 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3164742629 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0526315789 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378902189231 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135855014717 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673182842173 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256188036294 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532853327683 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.