Consumption of fast food has increased greatly in a last few years. It is often been argued that the reason for excessive weight gain reflect the higher intake of junk food. So, by simply increasing tax on these food items will not solve the problem, government should start awareness campaigns and encourage healthy eating habits in the citizens.
Many people says that imposing more tax on fast food will limit or reduce the intake of junk food. This might help to certain extent, however, it will \have a negative influence on middle class people. As, people earning extremely well will not get affected with an increase tax on such food products. So, even upon increasing the tax amount there will still be large number of people who would continue to buy fast food. On the contrary, the people with average salary will have to face the financial consequence, due to high price of such food items.
A better solution to curb this situation is, government can start doing Food awareness campaigns. For instance, in Ahmedabad, after the awareness programs conducted by Satvik food, regarding the ill effect of fast food, the data showed 60% of decline in the sell of most of the junk food products. Another way is by encouraging people to adopt health eating habits. As per today's scenario, most of the healthy food items are quiet expensive as compared to other food items. So, by making them affordable, many people would prefer to buy those products instead of food that harms their health.
In conclusion, as imposing more tax on junk food do not seem a viable option, as people from higher class would still be able to afford it. So instead, government can impart knowledge of the harmful effects of junk food by organizing camps. And also, by making helth food available at a lower cost will make people to turn toward health eating lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ative influence on middle class people. As, people earning extremely well will not...
^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...e to adopt health eating habits. As per todays scenario, most of the healthy food item...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83385579937 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38710977109 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573667711599 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8651957814 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37195521772 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132342171692 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818390158231 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237631133618 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403552958112 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.