Many people are of the opinion that the personal details like hobbies and marital status taken by the employers are useful to them, whereas others argue with disagreement toward it. I believe, an employee is considered as a family of that company, so it is relevant to gather all the information of a hired candidate, however, such information should not be considered in deciding the employment for that person.
All the companies across the globe asks for personal information of the applying candidate. This is because it might help the interviewer to know the background of the interviewee. It helps the HR to know the some preferences and goals of the candidate, for instance, if the employer is looking for a person who can relocate, so if they know that the candidate is unmarried, it gets easy for him or her to relocate as for married person moving entire family may seem difficult. So under such circumstances, such information proves to be helpful.
On the other hand, people who disagrees, thinks that most important thing to consider for a job are its skills. People are tested on their experiences and skills, and the personal information is just an unnecessary formality. Even though, most of the companies focuses on skills there are some people who rely on marital the marital status, especially for girls. Studies in India, has shown that majority of company rejects female candidate due to their unmarried status, thinking they might leave the company and migrate to other city after marriage. So, selecting candidates on that seems irrelevant, and it takes the opportunity from females to grow and achieve their career goals.
In conclusion, having a background check of a candidate is important for the company, and it also helps in deciding future opportunities. However, taking such personal information as a selecting procedure for the interviewee should not be practiced, as it demotivates the person and takes away the career goals from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...nterviewee. It helps the HR to know the some preferences and goals of the candidate,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, whereas, as for, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 32.9175257732 82% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 937.175257732 176% => OK
No of words: 325.0 206.0 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08615384615 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87547310231 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 127.690721649 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526153846154 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 290.88556701 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3955070345 44.8134815571 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.153846154 76.5299724578 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 16.8248392259 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 4.34317383033 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378702751724 0.216113520407 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128355296705 0.0766984524023 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067499544718 0.0603063233224 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224917205567 0.12726935374 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555797495016 0.0580467560999 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 8.37731958763 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 8.71597938144 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 41.2886597938 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.