It is suggested that everyone should have a car, a TV, and a fridge. DO the advantages of this development for society outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people believe that it is a sole right for every single individual to own some basic needs, such as a vehicle or some household appliances. Despite the possible drawbacks of such development, I hold the notion that its beneficial impacts are more valuable.
On the one hand, it is true that such possessions may contribute greatly to polluting the environment. To illustrate, if each person has a car of their own, this will lead to increasing in gas emissions; hence, elevating pollution rates. This is actually the case in vast numbers of metropolises nowadays. Another drawback is that most of house devices are not energy-sufficient; in other words, they exert an extra pressure on electricity consumption. Consequently, governments would respond to such pressure by consuming more natural resources, which, eventually, may cause disturbance in our finely balanced ecosystem.
On the other hand, I would side with the idea that this development may has more significant positive impacts. Not only would this progress enhance people’s lives but it would also reflect the outstanding performance of the authorities in introducing a comprehensive support to all individuals equally. The presence of a car for transportation, or a fridge to keep food fresh, all are examples of facilities which help make life easier for people. Furthermore, for everyone to enjoy such facilities, it is a salient example of the hard work that any government does in order to improve the quality of life of its people.
To conclude, although the availability of some negative impacts, predominantly related to the environment, I reiterate that it is a privilege for citizens to have commodities that might facilitate their daily lives which would eclipse their harmful effects on nature.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, such as, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32508833922 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2282899011 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625441696113 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9980158328 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.583333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115042580716 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389805905096 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330158139255 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610612871483 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038443800427 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.