Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. TO WHAT EXTENT do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that the continued existence of wildlife is of no more importance for us, and to continue to protect it may lead to scarcity in Earth’s natural resources. I entirely disagree with this statement for some reasons that will be discussed in this essay.
For one, every single living organism on our planet is taking part in balancing our ecosystem. To illustrate, all creatures, including wild animals, contribute to saving the environment by their regular daily activities; therefore, they do not allow any room for some possible drastic changes to happen on Earth. In 2007, Panda had reported as an endangered animal in China; after which, China suffered from the invasion of bamboo species which led to the omnipresence of dangerous mosquitoes. This is due to the tremendous decrease in the number of Pandas which feed on bamboo plants. Thus, there would be a fatal threat to environmental balance if wild animals disappeared.
In addition to this, help protecting such animals is irrelative to depletion of our planet resources. In contrarily, keeping the natural habitats of wild animals is directly proportional to our safety. For instance, scientists usually pay great attention to rainforests, which are one of the major oxygen sources, as they are habitant by plenty of wild animals. Consequently, they keep rainforests in such perfect condition to continue to supply us with enough oxygen. As a result, humans safety is significantly related to wild animals’ one.
To conclude, although some opinions might underestimate the remarkable value of wildlife, I reiterate that living side by side with wild animals is of utmost importance for human’s well-being and the natural resources as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to protect' or 'protect'.
Suggestion: to protect; protect
...isappeared. In addition to this, help protecting such animals is irrelative to depletion...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30072463768 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03372315159 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634057971014 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3172058992 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131474405754 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489027826714 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377797654566 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774076423355 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265160275565 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.