These days, thanks to technological advancements and deep changes in transportation, communication and farming people enjoy more free time than in the past. Airplanes able to break the sound barrier have conquered the sky, bullet trains hurtle to connect distant cities, cars fueled with solyr energy are nowadays reality. In the dawn of the time, humans had to rely on their legs or on horses and nothing has really changed for almost thousands of years. The most remarkable breaktrough was the introduction of the automobile, which has dramatically narrowed the distance between places. Then came the train, the airplane. All of these inventions have shrinked the time needed to reach a destination, ensuing more time available as a tangibly result.
Many believe that time is the most precious good we have. It cannot be baught, borrowed or even stolen but it can be wasted, misused and there is no way to get it back. For this reason, humans have thirsted over solutions to manage theit time as much efficently as possible. The technological growth have found its own way in other fields, not only in transportation. For example, let us consider appliances. Dishwashers, driers, washing machines, mixers, hoovers are nowadays essential part of every household and a life without them would be extremely more annoying. People do not have to waste hours in cleaning up apartments or washing dishes and they can use this time in a more proficient way, by learning, studying or simply relaxing.
I strongly believe that technology is the best ally of man. Afterall, someone said that the history of mankind is basically the history of technology. Beside improving our health and lengthening our life expectancy, inventions have a positive effect on our day to day life, making possible to reduce waste of time and to allowing us to focus on more important issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 734, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('tangibly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('result') instead of another adjective.
...ination, ensuing more time available as a tangibly result. Many believe that time is the most...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...hat technology is the best ally of man. Afterall, someone said that the history of manki...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84066232695 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649350649351 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1570969555 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211261049924 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561321712459 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580082566595 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123768646663 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537921525053 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.