Junk food advertising has a harmful effect on society and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a contentious issue whether the marketing of comfort foods has a dire effect on people and ought to be prohibited. As such adverts encourage people to eat less nutritious diet along with stimulating to eat out more often, this essay completely agrees to ban these advertisements.
Junk food advertisements persuade people to eat more which may lead to developing life-threatening diseases. Apparently, fast food advertisements are shot using high-definition cameras with mouth-watering cinematography of the ingredients present in it. Viewing these commercials repeatedly induce cravings to eat them. Obviously, by watching these adverts people consume more comfort foods which eventually make the general public obese and predisposed to life-threatening ailments. Therefore, if these marketing campaigns are not curbed the health of the general public is at stake.
Apart from increasing health issues, junk food commercials motivate people to spend more; making them spend-thrifts. Whenever people see taglines such as “Two Can Dine For $10” or “Family Meal for $20” on the billboards, they surmise such deals are economical instead of cooking at home. Resultantly, they become more inclined to eating out instead of cooking at home. This shift of eating out often results in spending people in an irresponsible way, or in the long run, they become broke by influenced by the adverts.
In conclusion, junk food marketing not only increases the probability of hypertensive and cardiac problems but also make people spend money in an obscene way which could lead to financial predicaments. Due to such aforementioned ramifications, I strongly believe that these commercials should be banned as they have no significant benefits for their consumers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...comfort foods which eventually make the general public obese and predisposed to life-threateni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...paigns are not curbed the health of the general public is at stake. Apart from increasing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an irresponsible way" with adverb for "irresponsible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng out often results in spending people in an irresponsible way, or in the long run, they become broke ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an obscene way" with adverb for "obscene"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...oblems but also make people spend money in an obscene way which could lead to financial predicame...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, may, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57992565056 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30654464924 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0191480875 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127209027066 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479312089614 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450240858396 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868109951359 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369394999688 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.